BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 206C(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Bangalore240Pune236Delhi178Chennai155Mumbai62Kolkata46Raipur44Cochin28Ahmedabad26Karnataka26Jodhpur20Jaipur18Rajkot17Nagpur16Indore14Surat10Panaji10Dehradun8Lucknow8Himachal Pradesh6Chandigarh4Amritsar4Guwahati4Hyderabad3Visakhapatnam3Cuttack2Telangana2SC1Rajasthan1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 234E21Section 200A8Section 206C6TDS4Deduction3Section 2502Section 250o2Section 2002Section 249(2)2Exemption

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS ) WARD, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 202/ASR/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Jun 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234ESection 250o

TDS is liable to pay by way of fee a sum of Rs. 200/- per day during which the failure continues. Section 234E of the Act inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f. 1-7-2012. reads as follows: - "234E. Fee for default in furnishing statements.—(1) Without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, where a person fails

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS ) WARD, AMRITSAR

2
Penalty2

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 203/ASR/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 Jun 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 200Section 200ASection 206CSection 234ESection 250o

TDS is liable to pay by way of fee a sum of Rs. 200/- per day during which the failure continues. Section 234E of the Act inserted by the Finance Act, 2012 w.e.f. 1-7-2012. reads as follows: - "234E. Fee for default in furnishing statements.—(1) Without prejudice to the provisions of the Act, where a person fails

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 189/ASR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar21 Aug 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 200ASection 234ESection 250

1. THE LATE FEE IMPOSED U/S234E FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR 2014-15 WAS WRONG AS THE CASE OF THE SAME FINANCIAL YEAR HAD ALREADY BEEN DECIDED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE AND THE ASSESSEE JUST IN ORDER TO REFELCT TDS DEDUCTED IN CASE OF ONE DEDUCTEE RE-FILED THE E-TDS RETURN UNDER THE BONAFIDE BELIEF THAT HIS LATE

PEPSU ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION,KAPURTHALA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), JALANDHAR, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 375/ASR/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Parikshit Aggarwal, C.A
Section 206CSection 206C(7)Section 249(2)Section 250

section, the assessee has been held to be assessee in default u/s 206C of the Act for non-collection of TCS, resulting in total TCS default of Rs.8.58 lakhs (including interest u/s 206C(7) of the Act as applicable). 3 I.T.A. No. 375/Asr/2024 Assessment Year: 2013-14 5. The order passed by the ITO (TDS) dated 10.02.2021 has been carried