BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 205clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai293Delhi250Bangalore156Karnataka105Hyderabad73Chennai58Ahmedabad57Kolkata52Jaipur43Raipur37Pune22Chandigarh19Indore11Guwahati11Surat11Lucknow9Rajkot8Patna7Visakhapatnam5Cochin5Telangana5Amritsar4Varanasi4SC4Agra3Cuttack3Nagpur2Ranchi2Jodhpur1Punjab & Haryana1Allahabad1Jabalpur1Panaji1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 26310Section 143(3)8Section 2744Section 1544TDS4Section 271(1)(c)3Section 2052Section 194H2Addition to Income2Deduction

SHRI HARINDER PAL SINGH,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 123/ASR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 154Section 205Section 250

TDS. 3.1 During hearing, the assessee relied on the order of the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Pushkar Prabhat Chandra Jain vs. Union of India & Anr. (2019) 309 CTR (Bom) 218 relevant para is extracted as below: “7. Section 205

M/S DICKSON ELECTRONICS,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD -3(1), SRINAGAR

In the result, ground of assessee related addition of interest amount to

2
ITA 33/ASR/2018[2013-14]Status: Disposed
ITAT Amritsar
27 Jul 2022
AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Manpreet Singh Duggal, Sr DR
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 201Section 250(6)Section 40

205 of APB. Further copies of purchase bills from BSNL are annexed from page no. 95 to 103 of APB. The BSNL sold goods by allowing discount @5.5% on total amount, also TDS was deducted @10% from the party. The same sim-cards were sold by the assessee to the parties and copy 2 M/s. Dickson Electronics, Srinagar Asstt Year

NARINDER AND COMPANY,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(5), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 93/ASR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar10 Oct 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Rohit Kapoor, C.A. and Sh. V.S. AggarwalFor Respondent: Sh. Rohit Sharma, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 263(1)Section 263p

TDS returns as submitted before the AO is placed at page no 92 of paper book. That it is pertinent to mention here that all 19 Narinder and Company v. ITO the loan raised were from family members and not from the outsiders and the same has been duly reported by the auditor at clause 28 of the audit report

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 131/ASR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 131/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 vide order dated 17.7.2015. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee, a firm in the business of sale and service of vehicles, returned its’ income for the year on 30/9/2012 at Rs.2625, setting off brought forward