GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY ,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) 7. The CIT(A) has while distinguishing the coordinate Bench decision has not been appreciated the facts of the case, in issuance of intimation under section 200A. In any cases before June 2015 no such levy shall be applicable during intimation under section 200A after 01.06.2015 as it is procedural lapse. Thus, relief has been provided to all cases

GULMARG DEVLOPMENT AUTHORITY,BARAMULA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), SRINAGAR

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS) 7. The CIT(A) has while distinguishing the coordinate Bench decision has not been appreciated the facts of the case, in issuance of intimation under section 200A. In any cases before June 2015 no such levy shall be applicable during intimation under section 200A after 01.06.2015 as it is procedural lapse. Thus, relief has been provided to all cases

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

c) of sub-section (1) of section 200A would be in nature of (a) clarificatory amendment. Even in absence of such provision, as noted, it was always open for the revenue to charge the fee in terms of section 234E of the Act. 7.2. The ld. DR and the ld. CIT(A) relied on the order

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS ) WARD, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

c) to (f) of section 200A(1) was substituted by the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 1-6-2015. The assessee contended before NFAC (CIT(A)/first appellate authority) that AO could levy fee u/s.234E of the Act while processing a return of I.T.A. Nos.202 & 203/Asr/2022 6 Assessment Years: 2018-19& 2019-20 TDS

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS ) WARD, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

c) to (f) of section 200A(1) was substituted by the Finance Act, 2015 w.e.f. 1-6-2015. The assessee contended before NFAC (CIT(A)/first appellate authority) that AO could levy fee u/s.234E of the Act while processing a return of I.T.A. Nos.202 & 203/Asr/2022 6 Assessment Years: 2018-19& 2019-20 TDS