KASHMIR DISTILLERIES PRIVATE LIMITED,JAMMU vs. CPC TDS, GHAZIBAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS returns imposed late fee under section 234E amounting to Rs.163,309/- and rupees 15,200/- respectively- 3. In the written

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS ) WARD, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS is liable to pay by way of fee a sum of Rs. 200/- per day during which the failure continues. Section

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( EXEMPTIONS ) WARD, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS is liable to pay by way of fee a sum of Rs. 200/- per day during which the failure continues. Section

SANT SOLIDER ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC-TDS, GHAZIBAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee through in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

section 200(A) of the Act thereby empowering the Assessing Officer to levy fee u/s 234E of the Act while processing the return u/s 200(A) of the Act. It has been consistently held by various Hon’ble Courts and Tribunals including this Tribunal in the case of M.G.N. Khalsa High School v. ACIT, CPC-TDS

SANT SOLIDER ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CPC-TDS, GHAZIBAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee through in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

section 200(A) of the Act thereby empowering the Assessing Officer to levy fee u/s 234E of the Act while processing the return u/s 200(A) of the Act. It has been consistently held by various Hon’ble Courts and Tribunals including this Tribunal in the case of M.G.N. Khalsa High School v. ACIT, CPC-TDS

SANT SOLDIER ENGINEERS AND CONTRCTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX .CPC-TDS, GHAZIBAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee through in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

section 200(A) of the Act thereby empowering the Assessing Officer to levy fee u/s 234E of the Act while processing the return u/s 200(A) of the Act. It has been consistently held by various Hon’ble Courts and Tribunals including this Tribunal in the case of M.G.N. Khalsa High School v. ACIT, CPC-TDS

SANT SOLDIER ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS PRIVATE LIMITED,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-CPC-TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee through in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Manish Borad

section 200(A) of the Act thereby empowering the Assessing Officer to levy fee u/s 234E of the Act while processing the return u/s 200(A) of the Act. It has been consistently held by various Hon’ble Courts and Tribunals including this Tribunal in the case of M.G.N. Khalsa High School v. ACIT, CPC-TDS

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD ( EXEMPTIONS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

200 or proviso to section 206C. Such penalty was prescribed at the rate of Rs.100 for every day during which the failure continued. With effect from 01.06.2012, three major changes were introduced in the Act. Section 234E as introduced for the first time to provide for charging of fee for late filing of the statements. Such fee would be levied

KC SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST (REGD),NAWANSHAHR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER . TDS., JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal is allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS statement and issuance of statement under section 200 A, an adjustment could be made in respect of the fee, if any shall

SHRI SATISH KUMAR. S/O. SH. HANS RAJ ,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4, HOSHIARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.संसंसंसं././././I.T.A No.258/Asr/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/A.Y.:2014-15 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" Shri Satish Kumar S/O Hans Raj, Vs. Principal Commissioner Of B-12, Mch-366/13, Billa Income-Tax-1, Jalandhar House, New Jagatpura, Hoshiarpur Pan: Aawpk 0932 D अपीलाथ" Appellant अपीलाथ" ""यथ"/Respondent ""यथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" ""यथ" ""यथ"

TDS under section 194C of the Act. The assessee debited Rs.5,91,030 as court fees paid for civil suit to recover Rs. Satish Kumar v. Pr.CIT- Jalandhar/I.T.A.No. 258/ASR/2019/A.Y. 14-15 Page 16 of 20 2,09,00,000 and Rs.17,53,638 against Kamaldeep Singh and M/s. Gupta Traders respectively how these are related to business activity not examined

B D S TECHNOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 200 A of the Act. No other adjustment in the amount refundable to, or recoverable from, the tax deductors, were permissible within the law as it existed at that point of time. 6. In the above view, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the coordinate bench decision in the case of Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (supra

B D S TECHNOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 200 A of the Act. No other adjustment in the amount refundable to, or recoverable from, the tax deductors, were permissible within the law as it existed at that point of time. 6. In the above view, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the coordinate bench decision in the case of Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (supra

B D S TECHNOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 200 A of the Act. No other adjustment in the amount refundable to, or recoverable from, the tax deductors, were permissible within the law as it existed at that point of time. 6. In the above view, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the coordinate bench decision in the case of Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (supra

B D S TECHNOLOGIES ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 200 A of the Act. No other adjustment in the amount refundable to, or recoverable from, the tax deductors, were permissible within the law as it existed at that point of time. 6. In the above view, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the coordinate bench decision in the case of Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (supra

B D S TECHOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 200 A of the Act. No other adjustment in the amount refundable to, or recoverable from, the tax deductors, were permissible within the law as it existed at that point of time. 6. In the above view, the ld. CIT(A) ought to have considered the coordinate bench decision in the case of Sibia Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. (supra

SH. MUZAFFER JAN PAMPORI,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE, SRINAGAR

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

section 144 of the Act by making an addition of Rs. 4,61,200/-. 5. Being aggrieved the assessee carried the matter to the Ld. CIT(A) who dismissed the appeal by passing the exparte order and sustained the addition made by the A.O. Ld. CIT(A) mentioned that the appeal was fixed for hearing on 05/10/2018, 22/02/2019 and 08/03/2019

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTIONS,), JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

200/- was made. In view of this, the matter in both the appeals is restored to the file of the CIT(A) for adjudication afresh. It is also directed that if the assessee society, under the circumstances, is found to exist not solely for educational purposes, the Ld. CIT(A) will also consider the claim of the assessee for grant

GURU NANAK DEV HEALTH & EDUCATION SOCIETY,LUDHIANA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

200/- was made. In view of this, the matter in both the appeals is restored to the file of the CIT(A) for adjudication afresh. It is also directed that if the assessee society, under the circumstances, is found to exist not solely for educational purposes, the Ld. CIT(A) will also consider the claim of the assessee for grant