Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 198clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5 Addition to Income5 Section 40A(3)4 Section 2(22)(e)4 Section 2744 Section 483 Section 271(1)(c)3 TDS3 Depreciation3 Disallowance

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

ITA 324/ASR/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar22 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36Section 36(1)(iii)Section 40A(3)

TDS under section 194-C is not applicable in this case as no oral or written agreement or contract was there. 7.1. Mr Singla has respectfully relied on judgement of High Court of Punjab and Haryanain the case of Commissioner of Income-tax, Chandigarhv.BhagwatiSteels[2011] 198

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

In the result the ground no

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

MR RUDER MANI WALIA,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2 (3), JALANDHAR

M/S G G OILS & FATS PVT.LTD ,BATHINDA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BATHINDA

THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL COOP BANK LTD,GURDASPUR vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE- VI,, PATHANKOT