BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 196clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi318Mumbai313Bangalore130Karnataka91Kolkata63Jaipur54Chennai50Raipur43Ahmedabad42Chandigarh19Indore18Dehradun15Visakhapatnam14Guwahati14Hyderabad12Jodhpur12Telangana7Lucknow7Amritsar7Panaji6Pune5Agra4Calcutta3Surat3Nagpur2SC1Cuttack1J&K1

Key Topics

Section 200A45Section 234E40Section 15410Section 686Section 246A(1)5Section 200A(1)5Section 2005TDS5Section 1474Long Term Capital Gains

B D S TECHNOLOGIES ,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 164/ASR/2021[2013-14 Q3]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vipul Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246A(1)

section 200A of the Act. " The above order was also followed by the Hon'ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Franchise India Brands Ltd.vs. CPC-TDS [2020] 122 taxmann.com 196

2
House Property2
Unexplained Money2

B D S TECHNOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 166/ASR/2021[2014-15 Q1]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vipul Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246A(1)

section 200A of the Act. " The above order was also followed by the Hon'ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Franchise India Brands Ltd.vs. CPC-TDS [2020] 122 taxmann.com 196

B D S TECHNOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 167/ASR/2021[2014-15 Q2]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vipul Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246A(1)

section 200A of the Act. " The above order was also followed by the Hon'ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Franchise India Brands Ltd.vs. CPC-TDS [2020] 122 taxmann.com 196

B D S TECHOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 163/ASR/2021[2013-14 Q-2]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vipul Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246A(1)

section 200A of the Act. " The above order was also followed by the Hon'ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Franchise India Brands Ltd.vs. CPC-TDS [2020] 122 taxmann.com 196

B D S TECHNOLOGIES,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 165/ASR/2021[2013-14 Q4]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Vipul Arora, CAFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 154Section 200Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234ESection 246A(1)

section 200A of the Act. " The above order was also followed by the Hon'ble Delhi ITAT in the case of Franchise India Brands Ltd.vs. CPC-TDS [2020] 122 taxmann.com 196

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH. CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 346/ASR/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

196/- which was claimed exempted u/s 10(38) of the Act. 6. It is revealed from the record that the shares of the said company were purchased by the assessee during the financial year 2012-13 @ Rs.7.30 per share , payments of which has been made through bank channel from Capital Small Finance Bank Ltd, ( A/c No xxxxx03904 ) on 26th October

SMT. SATYAWATI MARWAHA THROUGH LEGAL HEIR SH, CHANDER SHEIKHAR MARWAHA,JALANDHAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal for Asstt

ITA 347/ASR/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Sh. Udayan Dasgupta

For Appellant: Sh. Ashray Sarna, C. A
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 144Section 144rSection 147Section 148Section 151Section 250(6)Section 68

196/- which was claimed exempted u/s 10(38) of the Act. 6. It is revealed from the record that the shares of the said company were purchased by the assessee during the financial year 2012-13 @ Rs.7.30 per share , payments of which has been made through bank channel from Capital Small Finance Bank Ltd, ( A/c No xxxxx03904 ) on 26th October