INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BATHINDA vs. SH. MOHAN LAL, BATHINDA

Bench: Sh. T. S. Kapoor & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 170/(Asr)/2015 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Pan: Aajpl8560B Income Tax Officer, Vs. Sh. Mohan Lal Prop. Ward-1(2), Bathinda. M/S Ramji Dass Bko, Vill. Bhagiwander, Tehsil Talwandi Sabo, Distt. Bathinda. (Appellant) (Respondent)

TDS as per the provisions of section 194C of the Act, which attracted the mischief of the provisions of section

SHRI SATISH KUMAR. S/O. SH. HANS RAJ ,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-4, HOSHIARPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.संसंसंसं././././I.T.A No.258/Asr/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/A.Y.:2014-15 िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" िनधा"रणवष" Shri Satish Kumar S/O Hans Raj, Vs. Principal Commissioner Of B-12, Mch-366/13, Billa Income-Tax-1, Jalandhar House, New Jagatpura, Hoshiarpur Pan: Aawpk 0932 D अपीलाथ" Appellant अपीलाथ" ""यथ"/Respondent ""यथ" अपीलाथ" अपीलाथ" ""यथ" ""यथ"

TDS under section 194C of the Act. However, the perusal of records suggest that there is nothing on record that

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), SRINAGAR vs. M/S TRANS ASIA INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION (P) LTD, SRINAGAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS applicability on petty freight expenses which do not fall within the ambit of section 194C because no payment was above

THE TRANS ASIAN INDUSTRIES EXPOSITION PVT. LTD,SRINAGAR vs. THE ASSESING OFFICER(TDS), SRINAGAR

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee and the revenue

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS applicability on petty freight expenses which do not fall within the ambit of section 194C because no payment was above

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-IV,, PATHANKOT vs. THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL CO. OPBANK LTD, GURDASPUR

In the result, the ground no

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meenaandsh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS are not attracted on the supply of pamphlets, banners and other stationery items to the assessee as the same does not fall in the definition of “work” by virtue of sub clause (e) of clause (iv) of the explanation of section 194C

MESAGE. NORTHERN TRASFORMERS. INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,SRINAGAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2, SRINAGAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA 329/Asr/2019 is partly

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

194C of the Act for non-deduction of TDS. The assessee I.T.A. No.329/Asr/2019 6 was not able to clarify properly for reason for non-deduction of TDS on payment to transporter. The assessee was unable to mention any supporting case law in support of its reason for non-deduction of tax by contravening section

M/S KASHMIR CEMENT,UDHAMPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(4), UDHAMPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS as required under the proviso to section 194C of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) has concurred with the observation

MEASAGE.TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(4), FARIDKOT

In the result the ground no

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 194C of the Act as considered by Division Bench of this Court in the case of CIT (TDS) v. United

MEASAGE TAU AGRO SALES PRIVATE LIMITED,FARIDKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-3(2), FEROZEPUR

In the result the ground no

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 194C of the Act as considered by Division Bench of this Court in the case of CIT (TDS) v. United

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1`, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS-1, Jalandhar [PAN: JLDPO 2255B] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by None (Written submissions) Respondent by Ms. Priyanka Singla, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 22.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jalandhar dated

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER - TDS-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS-1, Jalandhar [PAN: JLDPO 2255B] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by None (Written submissions) Respondent by Ms. Priyanka Singla, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 22.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jalandhar dated

PUNJAB STATE WAREHOUSING CORPORATION,HOSHIARPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeals filed are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

TDS-1, Jalandhar [PAN: JLDPO 2255B] (Respondent) (Appellant) Appellant by None (Written submissions) Respondent by Ms. Priyanka Singla, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing : 22.12.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31.01.2023 ORDER Per Dr. M. L. Meena, AM: This bunch of appeals have been filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Jalandhar dated

FIRST INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LTD.,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee ITA No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.46/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13

194C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 3. That Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that reimbursement of freight, loading/unloading charges to the associate concern is not any payment for the services rendered by the associate concerns and therefore, has erre’d in law and on the facts and circumstances of case in confirming disallowance

SH. AMRINDER SINGH DHIMAN,NAKODAR vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE PHAGWARA, PHAGWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

section 194C, tax was required to be deducted on said payment. Accordingly, assessee was raised a query in this regard, vide order sheet noting dated 19.10.2012, which is reproduced as under:- "No TDS

M/S. ANAND TEXTILES ,PATHANKOT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD- 4 (1), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Sh. N. K. Choudhry & Sh. O. P. Meenai.T.A. No. 674/Asr/2019 Assessment Year: 2008-09

TDS on clearing and forwarding charges. 10. The AO noted that the assessee has made payment of Rs.5,03,743/- on account of clearing and forwarding charges on which tax was not deducted as per provisions of section 194C

INDERJIT SINGH,PHAGWARA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, PHAGAWARA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. Udayan Dasgupta & Sh. Brajesh Kumar Singh

section 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 4. That Appellant requests to add, amend or leave any grounds of appeal before the appeal is finally heard or disposed off.” 3. Brief facts emerging from records are that the assesseean individual (Mr. Inderjit Singh )is a partner of the partnership firm M/s Golden Auto Industries PAN: [AAKFG 9983E

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: Sh. T. S. Kapoor & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 298/(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 Pan: Aaact6167G Dy. C. I. T., Vs. M/S. The Jammu & Kashmir Circle-1, 2Nd Floor Aayakar Bank Ltd., Corporate Head Bhawan, Railhead Complex, Quarters, M. A. Road, Jammu. Srinagar. (Appellant) (Respondent)

TDS, the provisions of section 40(a)(ia) of the Act cannot be invoked. Herein the present case before us the assessee has deducted tax u/s 194C

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU, SRINAGAR vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

194C(2) of the Act and not u/s 1941 of the Act and there is no allegation that this TDS is not deposited with the Government account. We are of the view that the provisions of sec.40(a)(ia) has two limbs, one is where, inter alia, the assessee has to deduct tax and the second where after deducting