BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “TDS”+ Section 173clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi268Mumbai199Bangalore117Karnataka85Chennai74Pune74Chandigarh70Ahmedabad49Kolkata36Indore36Jaipur36Raipur32Ranchi27Lucknow21Dehradun18Visakhapatnam16Hyderabad13Patna7Surat6Cochin6Rajkot6Guwahati5Varanasi4Amritsar4Cuttack3Telangana2Uttarakhand2SC2

Key Topics

Section 406Section 143(3)3Section 43D3Section 40A(3)3Deduction3TDS3Disallowance3Addition to Income3Section 194A2Section 44A

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-IV,, PATHANKOT vs. THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL CO. OPBANK LTD, GURDASPUR

In the result, the ground no

ITA 542/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meenaandsh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 40Section 43D

173/- made u/s 40(a)(ia) of the Act on account of non deduction of TDS on Building Rent paid as assessee had failed to furnish the evidence regarding definite and ascertainable shares of co-owners to whom rent was paid. ii. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) has wrongly deleted the addition

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-3, AMRITSAR vs. M/S SURJIT SINGH AND CO, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is rejected

2
Section 1482
ITA 16/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar31 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 40A(3)

section 40A(3) of the Income Tax to the extent of Rs. 1,02,52,935/- on account of claim of payment of site charges/labour charges and, therefore, not allowable as deduction. 3. Appellant craves leave to add, amend or alter any ground of appeal.” 4. Briefly the facts are that the assessee is a civil contractor engaged in constructing

THE GURDASPUR CENTRAL COOP BANK LTD,GURDASPUR vs. THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE- VI,, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 681/ASR/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar24 May 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N. K. Choudhryi.T.A. No. 681/Asr/2017 (And Stay Application No. 01/Asr/2018) Assessment Year: 2014-15

For Appellant: Sh. Vinamar Gupta & Vibhore Gupta (CAs.)For Respondent: Smt. Prabhjot Kaur CIT (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 194ASection 40Section 44A

section 194A providing saving to the provision under specific circumstances and, submitting, on that basis, that no disallowance u/s. 40(a)(ia) is called for: Particulars Amount (Rs.) Total Interest paid 394488470 Interest not disallowed -8172420 Total Interest disallowed 386,316,050 Saving Account Interest 128,724,577 RD Interest 1,705,554 FDR Interest below

MEASAGE BHAI INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MOGA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-1, MOGA

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 358/ASR/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar11 Aug 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: Sh. Sudhir SehgalFor Respondent: Sh. S. M. Surendranath, Sr. DR
Section 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 44A

173 dated 10(11)/10/2018, where in your goodself had supplied usthe reasons recorded for issuance of notice u/s 148. To this reasons our objections are as under: 1. That we have purchased wheat from M/s Kamna Overseas (PAN: AKIPM5541L), 2087-A, Mandi Narela, Delhi on various occasions during the F.Y. 2010 - 11. In total we have purchased wheat