BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 149(1)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi418Mumbai346Bangalore246Chennai115Hyderabad106Chandigarh105Karnataka97Cochin95Ahmedabad80Jaipur66Raipur59Pune48Kolkata46Lucknow28Indore22Agra15Cuttack14Guwahati9Amritsar9Rajkot8Nagpur8Visakhapatnam8Dehradun7Surat7Jodhpur5Kerala5Allahabad3SC2Varanasi2Patna2Rajasthan1Telangana1

Key Topics

Section 4021Section 143(3)9Depreciation9TDS9Addition to Income9Section 250(6)8Deduction8Disallowance8Section 14A(3)7Section 36

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU, SRINAGAR vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 790/ASR/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

7
Section 2744
Section 271(1)(c)3

In the result, the ground No

ITA 320/ASR/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME -TAX , CIRCLE -1,, JAMMU vs. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD.,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 637/ASR/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU vs. MESERS JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LIMITED , SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 319/ASR/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 297/ASR/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2006-07

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

THE JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED,SRINAGAR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, JAMMU

In the result, the ground No

ITA 330/ASR/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

THE DY. COMMISSIONER INCOME-TAX, JAMMU vs. M/S. THE JAMMU & KASHMIR BANK LTD,, SRINAGAR

In the result, the ground No

ITA 296/ASR/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar26 Sept 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 14A(3)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 40

B Bench in case of DCIT Circle-33 Vs. M/s S.K. Teriwal and ignoring the jurisdictional ITAT, Amritsar Order dated 02.02.2017 in ITA No. 74 ad 137 (Asr)/2015 for the A. Y. 2010.11 and 2011-12 in case of this assessee. 5. The Ld. CIT(A), Jammu has erred in restricting the disallowances to Rs. 13,80,754/- instead

JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) CIRCLE-3, FEROZEPUR vs. MEASAGE OM SONS MARKETING PRIVATE LIMITED, FARIDKOT

In the result, the appeal of the revenue bearing ITA No

ITA 407/ASR/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Jul 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 143(3)Section 250(6)Section 37(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

1) of the Act.” 3. Brief fact of the case is that during the year under consideration, assessee had filed its return of income on 29.09.2015 declaring ‘NIL’ income. The case of the Assessee was selected under CASS for complete scrutiny. The assessment order was passed on dated 29.12.2016.The ld.AO had made the following additions: Returned Loss

MESERS MALWA MOTORS,BATHINDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), BATHINDA

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 131/ASR/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Jun 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. No. 131/Asr/2018 Assessment Year: 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. P. N. Arora (Adv.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (D.R.)
Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' hereinafter) for Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13 vide order dated 17.7.2015. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the assessee, a firm in the business of sale and service of vehicles, returned its’ income for the year on 30/9/2012 at Rs.2625, setting off brought forward