Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Rectification u/s 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468 Delhi419 Mumbai324 Pune251 Bangalore217 Chennai161 Indore144 Kolkata123 Ahmedabad72 Chandigarh71 Hyderabad69 Cochin62 Jaipur42 Visakhapatnam39 Nagpur30 Jabalpur27 Raipur26 Karnataka24 Jodhpur24 Lucknow24 Surat19 Agra17 Rajkot16 Amritsar9 Allahabad9 Dehradun8 Guwahati8 Cuttack6 Panaji4 Ranchi1 SC1 Telangana1 Varanasi1 Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 15428 Section 234E14 Section 194C7 TDS7 Rectification u/s 1547 Section 200A6 Section 2505 Deduction5 Section 143(3)4 Section 194J

RAJOURI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,RAJOURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 185/ASR/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Aug 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Mohit Kumar Nigam, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

rectification application u/s 154. In ground no. 2 & 3 raised by the appellant, charging of late fee u/s 234E for filing TDS

RAJOURI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ,RAJOURI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), JAMMU

3

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 186/ASR/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar07 Aug 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. Mohit Kumar Nigam, Sr. DR

Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246A

rectification application u/s 154. In ground no. 2 & 3 raised by the appellant, charging of late fee u/s 234E for filing TDS

FIRST INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LTD.,JALANDHAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee ITA No

ITA 46/ASR/2023[2012-13]Status: HeardITAT Amritsar20 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.46/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2012-13

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 154oSection 194CSection 250Section 40

rectification Order passed by Ld. AO u/s 154 of Income Tax Act, 1961 is unsustainable in law. 2. That Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that reimbursement of freight, loading/unloading charges to the associate concern are not in the nature of payment for any sum for carrying out any work and therefore, the reimbursement of expenses is outside

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 284/ASR/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

TDS) [2011] 335 ITR 287 (Pat), relied by the Revenue, directory. Further, that where the consequence/s of the breach of the time limit is not provided, the same is directory, is part of well-settled law, as explained by the Hon’ble Orissa High Court in Bhakta Vedanta Swami Charitable Trust v. CIT (in WP(C) 12347 of 2005 dated

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is (in ITA No

ITA 561/ASR/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar13 May 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arorai.T.A. Nos. 561/Asr/2018 & 284/Asr/2017 Assessment Year: 2006-07

For Appellant: Sh. Tarsem Lal, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass, Sr. D.R

Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 50C

TDS) [2011] 335 ITR 287 (Pat), relied by the Revenue, directory. Further, that where the consequence/s of the breach of the time limit is not provided, the same is directory, is part of well-settled law, as explained by the Hon’ble Orissa High Court in Bhakta Vedanta Swami Charitable Trust v. CIT (in WP(C) 12347 of 2005 dated

DHILLON AND SIMRAN LIVER FIBRO SCAN CENTRE,AMRITSAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS)-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 92/ASR/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 May 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 154Section 194CSection 194JSection 234ESection 250

rectification of the demand of Rs.35,872/-. 2. At the outset, the ld. counsel for the assessee stated that the ld. CIT(A) NFAC has rejected the appeal of the assessee without appreciating the fact of the case that the Assessing Officer (AO)(TDS-CPC) has refused to resolve the demand being created towards fee u/s 234E at Rs.44

SHRI HARINDER PAL SINGH,JALANDHAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, JALANDHAR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 123/ASR/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar27 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 153ASection 154Section 205Section 250

TDS of the assessee. The assessee filed a rectification petition before the ld. AO u/s 154 and prayed for accept

SHRI NAVNEET SINGH ,AMRITSAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-1, AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 266/ASR/2022[2022-21]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar28 Apr 2023AY 2022-21

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjee

Section 154Section 43B

TDS u/s 43B, since the aforesaid sum of Rs.8,84,661/- has been reduced to Rs.25,400/- by rectification order passed by CPC, Bengluru vide rectification order u/s 154

SURJIT MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY ,FEROZEPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER ( TDS), AMRITSAR

In the result, the appeal bearing ITA No

ITA 129/ASR/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar25 Aug 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. M. L. Meena & Sh. Anikesh Banerjeei.T.A. No.129/Asr/2023 Assessment Year: 2017-18 Surjit Memorial Educational Vs. Nfac, Delhi/C/O Asstt. Society, C/O Jaswinder Singh Commissioner Of Income & Associates, Chartered Tax Circle-4, Jalandhar. Accountant, 53 Street No.1, Dhawan Colony Freozepur (Respondent) City. Punjab. [Pan: 7G] (Appellant)

Section 154Section 250o

u/s 154 of the Act. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds: “1. THAT THE REFUND ON ACCOUNT OF TDS WAS NOT ALLOWED WHICH THOUGH GETS REFLECTED IN FORM 26AS .AUDITED BALANCE SHEET AND ALSO CLAIMED IN THE RETURN WHICH IS A MISTAKE APPARENT FROM THE RECORD WHICH NEEDED RECTIFICATION