Search: TDS | BharatTax

8 results for “TDS”+ Block Assessmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)12 Section 143(3)7 Disallowance5 Section 1544 Section 250(6)3 Penalty3 Section 362 Section 271(1)(c)2 Section 50C2 Section 250

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAMMU vs. BABA GHULAM SHAH BADSHAH UNIVERSITY , RAJOURI.

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue Department is dismissed

ITA 120/ASR/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar16 Nov 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Sanjay Arora & Sh. N.K.Choudhry

For Appellant: Sh. R.K.Gupta & Akshun Gupta (Ld. CAs.)For Respondent: Sh. Charan Dass (Ld. DR)

Section 250(6)

Assessing Officer by holding that since the deductees have complied with the provisions of law, therefore the PR should not have been held to be assessee in default for the purpose of Sec.201 & 201(1A) of the Act. Further, while relying upon the case of ITO vs. Block Development Officer, Sunderbani, Dstt. Rajouri in ITA No.63(Asr)/2014 dated

SPARROW SECURITY SERVICES ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JAMMU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAMMU vs. BABA GHULAM SHAH BADSHAH UNIVERSITY , RAJOURI.

SPARROW SECURITY SERVICES ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JAMMU

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, JAMMU vs. BABA GHULAM SHAH BADSHAH UNIVERSITY , RAJOURI.

SPARROW SECURITY SERVICES ,JAMMU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), JAMMU

M/S EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD. ,PATHANKOT vs. D.C.I.T, CIRCLE-6,, PATHANKOT

MESERS EMBROCIA FARMS PVT LTD,PATHANKOT vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-6, PATHANKOT

M/S. JAMMU & KASHMIR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION,JAMMU & KASHMIR vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER,, SRINAGAR

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SRINAGAR vs. M/S. J&K PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, SRINAGAR

M/S. JAMMU & KASHMIR PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION,JAMMU vs. THE ASSESSING OFFICER,, SRINAGAR

THE ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, SRINAGAR vs. M/S. J&K PROJECT CONSTRUCTION, SRINAGAR