BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 58clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai972Delhi777Hyderabad194Chennai184Bangalore159Jaipur145Ahmedabad106Indore72Kolkata71Cochin69Chandigarh60Pune48Rajkot44Raipur30Surat29Visakhapatnam26Lucknow25Agra19Cuttack19Nagpur17Dehradun10Amritsar8Jodhpur5Panaji3Allahabad3Patna2Guwahati2Ranchi1Jabalpur1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 119Section 2(15)9Section 143(3)3Section 123Section 260A3Exemption3Addition to Income3

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

58 of the UPUPDA, 1973 to demonstrate that on dissolution of Allahabad Development Authority, all the properties, funds and dues which were vested, or realizable by AYs. 2014-15 to 2016-17 the authority, would vest in or be realizable by the State Government and he opined, that it was the discretion of the State Government to apply

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 87/ALLD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

58 of the UPUPDA, 1973 to demonstrate that on dissolution of Allahabad Development Authority, all the properties, funds and dues which were vested, or realizable by AYs. 2014-15 to 2016-17 the authority, would vest in or be realizable by the State Government and he opined, that it was the discretion of the State Government to apply

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

58 of the UPUPDA, 1973 to demonstrate that on dissolution of Allahabad Development Authority, all the properties, funds and dues which were vested, or realizable by AYs. 2014-15 to 2016-17 the authority, would vest in or be realizable by the State Government and he opined, that it was the discretion of the State Government to apply