M.K. AGRAWAL & CO.,SONEBHADRA vs. ACIT RANGE-III, MIRZAPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 309/ALLD/2017[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad03 Dec 2020AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2010-11 M.K. Agrawal & Co., V. Acit, Range-Ii, Mirzapur Sonebhadra
For Appellant: Shri S. K. Jaiswal, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 194ASection 194ISection 2Section 40Section 40a
transferring title in favour of the hirer. On the other hand, if the hirer does not exercise his option, then the goods in question must be returned and the payments so far made are treated to be rentals.
Therefore, the whole concept is with regard to payment of consideration money or rental not repayment of loan amount in financial transaction