BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “transfer pricing”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi229Mumbai73Chennai24Jaipur21Kolkata11Dehradun10Nagpur6Surat4Amritsar4Hyderabad4Pune4Ahmedabad4Bangalore3Chandigarh3Lucknow3Allahabad3Indore3Jodhpur1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 119Section 2(15)9Section 143(3)3Section 123Section 260A3Exemption3Addition to Income3

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

260A of the Act. 4. BECAUSE the learned CIT(A) erred both on facts and in law in following the judgment and order dated 07.11.2013 passed by the Hon'ble Jammu & Kashmir High Court in the case of Jammu & Kashmir Development Authority vs. Union of India (against which SLP has been rejected vide order dated

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 87/ALLD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

260A of the Act. 4. BECAUSE the learned CIT(A) erred both on facts and in law in following the judgment and order dated 07.11.2013 passed by the Hon'ble Jammu & Kashmir High Court in the case of Jammu & Kashmir Development Authority vs. Union of India (against which SLP has been rejected vide order dated

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

260A of the Act. 4. BECAUSE the learned CIT(A) erred both on facts and in law in following the judgment and order dated 07.11.2013 passed by the Hon'ble Jammu & Kashmir High Court in the case of Jammu & Kashmir Development Authority vs. Union of India (against which SLP has been rejected vide order dated