BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “section 68”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka322Delhi295Mumbai174Kolkata145Bangalore116Ahmedabad83Agra62Jaipur55Lucknow31Chennai30Chandigarh30Indore24Hyderabad19Pune12Cochin12Surat9Guwahati8Dehradun8Jodhpur7Visakhapatnam6Ranchi4Varanasi4Telangana4SC4Allahabad3Rajkot3K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN A.K. SIKRI1Raipur1Cuttack1Andhra Pradesh1Orissa1Nagpur1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)5Section 1474Section 1484Addition to Income3Section 2502Charitable Trust2

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 108/ALLD/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad27 Dec 2024AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Sh. Amresh Kumar Singh (In person)For Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

68,250/-. The returns so filed by the assessee were in consonance with his earlier returns, filed by him under section 139(4), in which he had declared a similar amount of income from salary. However, in between, a revised return had been filed by the assessee on 24.05.2013( for AY 2012-13) declaring total income of Rs.6

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO 2 (1), ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 109/ALLD/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad27 Dec 2024AY 2012-13
For Appellant: Sh. Amresh Kumar Singh (In person)For Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 250

68,250/-. The returns so filed by the assessee were in consonance with his earlier returns, filed by him under section 139(4), in which he had declared a similar amount of income from salary. However, in between, a revised return had been filed by the assessee on 24.05.2013( for AY 2012-13) declaring total income of Rs.6

ANKIT GUPTA,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE- 1(1) , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 133/ALLD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 143(3)Section 68

section 143(3) of the Act on 06/12/2019 and determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.2,49,13,482/- by making addition of Rs.1,65,55,042/- on account of unexplained capital addition u/s 68