Search: section 68

4 results for “section 68”+ Section 391clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1326 Section 153A(1)(b)6 Section 153A6 Addition to Income4 Section 143(1)3 Section 36(1)3 Section 271(1)(c)3 Penalty3 Disallowance3

SANKAR LAL JAISWAL,,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 80/ALLD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad28 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: SH. SUBHASH MALGURIA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SH. NIKHIL CHOUDHARY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 250

391/- is highly unjustified and before applying said rate no comparable case was brought on 1 Shankar Lal Jaiswal A.Y. 2017-18 record nor past history in assessee own case was considered hence simply on presumption addition made is highly unjustified. 4. That in any view of the matter the addition of Rs. 1,68,000/- as made

KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

SANKAR LAL JAISWAL,,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

SANKAR LAL JAISWAL,,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

KESARWANI & C0.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT., ALLAHABAD

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD