SURESH CHANDRA PURWAR (HUF),ALLAHABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee with tribunal in ITA No

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2011-12

3 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Suresh Chandra Purwar(HUF) adjustment of cash seized during the course of search and seizure operations against the tax-liability determined on assessment , and hence no interest be leviable u/s 234B of the 1961 Act. The interest u/s 234B amounting to Rs. 57,12,930/- was levied by the AO vide orders dated 21.10.2015 , which

NEERAJ AGRAWAL,,MIRZAPUR vs. DCIT, MIRZAPUR

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act,1961(hereinafter called “ the Act”). We have heard these cross appeals in Open Court proceedings through physical hearing mode. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in memo of appeal filed with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, U.P. (hereinafter called “ the tribunal”), in ITA No. 100/Alld./2017

DCIT CIRCLE-3, MIRZAPUR vs. SHRI NEERAJ AGRAWAL, MIRZAPUR

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

Section 143(3) of the Income-tax Act,1961(hereinafter called “ the Act”). We have heard these cross appeals in Open Court proceedings through physical hearing mode. 2. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal in memo of appeal filed with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad, U.P. (hereinafter called “ the tribunal”), in ITA No. 100/Alld./2017

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

234B, & 234C of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.113, 114, 115 & 129/Alld/2025 Assessment Years:2011-12 to 13-14 3 7. That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law and on facts in initiating the penalty proceedings against the Appellant under Section

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, ,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

234B, & 234C of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.113, 114, 115 & 129/Alld/2025 Assessment Years:2011-12 to 13-14 3 7. That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law and on facts in initiating the penalty proceedings against the Appellant under Section

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD vs. JYOTI MEDISERVICES LTD., ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

234B, & 234C of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.113, 114, 115 & 129/Alld/2025 Assessment Years:2011-12 to 13-14 3 7. That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law and on facts in initiating the penalty proceedings against the Appellant under Section

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

234B, & 234C of the Act. I.T.A. Nos.113, 114, 115 & 129/Alld/2025 Assessment Years:2011-12 to 13-14 3 7. That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law and on facts in initiating the penalty proceedings against the Appellant under Section

SHRI MAHAVEER CHARITABLE TRUST,ALLAHABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), LUCKNOW

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Shri Mahaveer Charitable V. Commissioner Of Income Tax Trust (Exemption), Lucknow 46, Rajendra Nagar Balua Ghat, Allahabad Tan/Pan: Aahts9123K (Respondent) Appellant By: Mr. Pawan Jaiswal, C.A. Respondent By: Mr. Shantanu Dhamija, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 03.08.2021 O R D E R

section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The Commissioner opined that the order passed by the AO u/s 143(3) was not made in accordance with the provisions of law and prima facie erroneous and prejudice to the interest of the Revenue. The Commissioner also observed that the AO erred in not charging interest u/s 234A and 234B

SUBHASH STONE PRODUCT (P) LTD.,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

M/S SUBHASH STONE PRODUCT PRIVATE LIMITED,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

M/S JAI MAA SHARDA SERVICE STATION,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

M/S JAI MAA SHARDA SERVICE STATION,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD vs. VIJAY STONE PRODUCTS, SONEBHADRA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD vs. VIJAY STONE PRODUCT, SONEBHADRA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(C.C.), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, (CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

234B and 234C of the Income Tax Act is highly unjustified.” 5. Subsequent to the filing of the grounds of appeal, the assessee on 6.08.2024 filed the following additional grounds of appeal which reads as under:- “1. That in any view of the matter the approval granted on the basis of draft assessment order by the Joint Commissioner of Income