ANURAG YADAV,KANNAUJ vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2)(3), KANNAUJ, UTTAR PRADESH
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 78/ALLD/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2015-2016
Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2015-16 Anurag Yadav V. The Income Tax Officer, Mahmoodpur Keerat, Nigoh Ward-4(2)(3) Khas, Chhibramau Kannauj, Income Tax Office, Kannauj-209721. Kannauj, Kannauj- 209721. Pan:Adbpy5023B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: (Application) Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 08 09 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 09 2025 O R D E R
For Appellant: (Application)For Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 144BSection 147Section 148Section 148ASection 151Section 68
148A of the Act were not complied with, in true letter and spirit, accordingly, the proceedings are bad in law and thus liable to be set aside.
Page 2 of 5
4. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts in passing the appellate order upholding the assessment order is unsustainable in law as the sanction
