JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

4. That the documents, explanations filed by the Appellant, and the material available on record have not been properly considered and judicially interpreted and have been wrongly ignored. 5. That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has .erred in law and on facts in charging the interest under Sections 234A, 234B, & 234C

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

4. That the documents, explanations filed by the Appellant, and the material available on record have not been properly considered and judicially interpreted and have been wrongly ignored. 5. That in view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has .erred in law and on facts in charging the interest under Sections 234A, 234B, & 234C

M/S MEZA FILLING STATION ,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD

In the result, Appeal i.e

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice.” AY 2009-10 “1. BECAUSE the assessment proceeding initiated under section 153C without recording of any valid satisfaction note in the case of person who is subjected to search under section 132, is vitiated and liable

M/S MEZA FILLING STATION ,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD

In the result, Appeal i.e

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice.” AY 2009-10 “1. BECAUSE the assessment proceeding initiated under section 153C without recording of any valid satisfaction note in the case of person who is subjected to search under section 132, is vitiated and liable

M/S MEZA FILLING STATION ,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD

In the result, Appeal i.e

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice.” AY 2009-10 “1. BECAUSE the assessment proceeding initiated under section 153C without recording of any valid satisfaction note in the case of person who is subjected to search under section 132, is vitiated and liable

M/S MEZA FILLING STATION ,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD

In the result, Appeal i.e

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice.” AY 2009-10 “1. BECAUSE the assessment proceeding initiated under section 153C without recording of any valid satisfaction note in the case of person who is subjected to search under section 132, is vitiated and liable

M/S MEZA FILLING STATION ,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD

In the result, Appeal i.e

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 8. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice.” AY 2009-10 “1. BECAUSE the assessment proceeding initiated under section 153C without recording of any valid satisfaction note in the case of person who is subjected to search under section 132, is vitiated and liable

SHRI BACHANU RAM,,MIRZAPUR vs. ITO,, MIRZAPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee with tribunal in ITA No

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2009-10 Sri Bachanu Ram, V. Ito, Range – Iii(1), Mirzapur, Saketpuri Colony, Sabri, U.P. Mirzapur,U.P. Pan: Beqps 3977 K (Appellant) (Respondent)

234B, and 234C of the income tax act is section highly unjustified. 8. That in any view of the matter the appellant reserves his right to take any fresh ground of the appeal before hearing of the appeal. It is therefore prayed that a suitable order may kindly be passed and relief may please be allowed accordingly” 2 Assessment Year