SHRI BACHANU RAM,,MIRZAPUR vs. ITO,, MIRZAPUR
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee with tribunal in ITA No
ITA 185/ALLD/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad04 Dec 2020AY 2009-10
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2009-10 Sri Bachanu Ram, V. Ito, Range – Iii(1), Mirzapur, Saketpuri Colony, Sabri, U.P. Mirzapur,U.P. Pan: Beqps 3977 K (Appellant) (Respondent)
For Appellant: Shri Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 69
1) hence the mandatory requirement of service of notice of not complied with nor any reasons for supplied and therefore the entire assessment liable to be annulled.
5. That in any view of the matter addition of Rs. 12,30,000/- by saying unexplained investment u/s 69 as made by the assessing officer and confirm by the Commission