MADHURENDRA NATH,ALLAHABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals in ITA No

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2013-14 Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Smt. Neeta Nath, L/H Of Lt. Dr. Jitendra Nath Income Tax, Central Circle, Civil Lines, Allahabad B/401, Mayan Enclave, 49/13, Clive Road, Allahabad Pan-Abepn1795Q (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2013-14 Madhurendra Nath, Vs. The Asstt. Commissioner Of B-502, Vinayak Le Grande, Income Tax, Central Circle, 16/12, Lal Bahadur Shastri Civil Lines, Allahabad Road, Allahabad-211001 Pan-Aaipn8161D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Siddharth Pathak, Adv Respondent By: Sh. Rabin Chaudhari, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 18.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 16.02.2023 O R D E R Shri Vijay Pal Rao, J.M.: These Two Appeals By The Two Related Assessees Are Directed Against Two Separate Orders Of The Cit(A), Both Dated 28.04.2016 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. These Appeals Are Arising From The Assessment Orders Passed Under Section 153C In Pursuant To The Search & Seizure Action Under Section 132(1) Of The Income Tax Act, Dated 05.12.2013 In The Case Of Shri. Hemant Kumar Sindhi. Therefore, The Facts & Circumstances As Well As The Grounds Of Appeal

E R SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, J.M.: These two appeals by the two related assessees are directed against two separate orders of the CIT(A), both dated 28.04.2016 for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. These appeals are arising from the assessment orders passed under section 153C in pursuant to the search and seizure action under section

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, ,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

section 153A have been framed by ACIT, Central Circle, New Delhi, therefore, prior approval of the JCIT in respect of each assessment year referred to under section 153A or 153B shall have to be obtained. Thus, no order of assessment or re-assessment shall be passed by the A.O. in the present cases in respect of each assessment years under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD vs. JYOTI MEDISERVICES LTD., ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

section 153A have been framed by ACIT, Central Circle, New Delhi, therefore, prior approval of the JCIT in respect of each assessment year referred to under section 153A or 153B shall have to be obtained. Thus, no order of assessment or re-assessment shall be passed by the A.O. in the present cases in respect of each assessment years under

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

section 153A have been framed by ACIT, Central Circle, New Delhi, therefore, prior approval of the JCIT in respect of each assessment year referred to under section 153A or 153B shall have to be obtained. Thus, no order of assessment or re-assessment shall be passed by the A.O. in the present cases in respect of each assessment years under

JYOTI MEDISERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

section 153A have been framed by ACIT, Central Circle, New Delhi, therefore, prior approval of the JCIT in respect of each assessment year referred to under section 153A or 153B shall have to be obtained. Thus, no order of assessment or re-assessment shall be passed by the A.O. in the present cases in respect of each assessment years under

SHERVANI SUGAR SYNDICATE LIMITED,C/O B. K. KAPUR CO. vs. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2012-13 Shervani Sugar Syndicate V. National Faceless Limited Assessment Centre 17, Navyug Market, Ghaziabad- Delhi. 201001. Pan:Aadcs3658L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shervani Sugar Syndicate V. Dc/Acit-2, Allahabad Limited Office Of The Assistant C/O 17, Navyug Market, Commissioner Of Income Ghaziabad-201001. Tax, Allahabad, Allahabad-211001. Pan:Aadcs3658L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Madhav Kapur Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 23 09 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 09 2025 O R D E R

E R PER SUBHASH MALGURIA, J.M.: These two appeals have been filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2012-13 against the respective impugned appellate orders each dated 14.02.2025. For the sake of convenience, both appeals were heard together and are being ITA No.137 & 138/ALLD/2025 Page 2 of 6 disposed of by way of consolidated order. First, we take

SHERVANI SUGAR SYNDICATE LIMITED,GHAZIABAD vs. DC/ACIT-2, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2012-13 Shervani Sugar Syndicate V. National Faceless Limited Assessment Centre 17, Navyug Market, Ghaziabad- Delhi. 201001. Pan:Aadcs3658L (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2012-13 Shervani Sugar Syndicate V. Dc/Acit-2, Allahabad Limited Office Of The Assistant C/O 17, Navyug Market, Commissioner Of Income Ghaziabad-201001. Tax, Allahabad, Allahabad-211001. Pan:Aadcs3658L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Madhav Kapur Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 23 09 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 09 2025 O R D E R

E R PER SUBHASH MALGURIA, J.M.: These two appeals have been filed by the assessee pertaining to assessment year 2012-13 against the respective impugned appellate orders each dated 14.02.2025. For the sake of convenience, both appeals were heard together and are being ITA No.137 & 138/ALLD/2025 Page 2 of 6 disposed of by way of consolidated order. First, we take

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

E R PER BENCH: These TEN appeals have been preferred by two different assessees. The appeals in ITA Nos.50 to 54/Alld/2023 in the case of Sanjana are directed against separate orders, all dated 06.03.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for assessment years 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15, ITA Nos.50, 51, 52, 53 & 54/ALLD/2023 & ITA Nos.5

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

E R PER BENCH: These appeals have been filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), Allahabad vide his separate orders dated 14.03.2014, 19.03.2014 and 23.09.2014. As the issues involved in many of these appeals are similar, all the appeals are being taken up for disposal together for the sake of convenience. Ongoing

KESARWANI & C0.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT., ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

E R PER BENCH: These appeals have been filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), Allahabad vide his separate orders dated 14.03.2014, 19.03.2014 and 23.09.2014. As the issues involved in many of these appeals are similar, all the appeals are being taken up for disposal together for the sake of convenience. Ongoing