AJIT TRIPATHI,ALLAHABAD vs. CIT (A), DELHI
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed
ITA 39/ALLD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad16 Feb 2023AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2017-18 Ajit Tripathi, V. Income Tax Officer, Village Pandor, Jasra, Ward-1(1), Allahabad Allahabad, U.P. Pan:Aknpt9902B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri. S.K. Yogeshwar, Adv Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 14 02 2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 16 02 2023 O R D E R
For Appellant: Shri. S.K. Yogeshwar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 271Section 271ASection 44A
2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:-
“i. That the authority below was not justified in imposing penalty under section 271 A at Rs. 25,000/- ii. That on estimate basis income was estimated Rs.
4,59,800/- as against Rs. 31,177/- shown.
iii. That the authority below was not justified in imposing penalty u/s 271A