Search: penalty u/s 271

3 results for “penalty u/s 271”+ Section 195clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi170 Mumbai152 Bangalore53 Ahmedabad35 Chandigarh33 Jaipur30 Raipur27 Kolkata17 Chennai14 Indore13 Pune11 Amritsar10 Hyderabad8 Lucknow8 Surat5 Cochin4 Allahabad3 Nagpur2

Key Topics

Section 119 Section 2(15)9 Section 143(3)3 Section 123 Section 260A3 Exemption3 Addition to Income3

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR

Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

u/s section 11. (3) Because the CIT(A) erred both on facts and in law in confirming the addition of net excess of income over expenditure of Rs.3,00,11,855/ under the head Income from business or profession. (4) Because the CIT(A) erred both on facts and in law in sustaining the addition of Rs.36