Search: house property

2 results for “house property”+ Section 80clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)3 Section 142(1)2 Section 50C2 Addition to Income2

KAMLA DEVI,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

ITA 572/ALLD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad07 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2010-11 V. Joint Commissioner Of Smt. Parvati Devi L/H Late Kamla Devi, Sahson, Allahabad, Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad U.P. Pan-Bfrpd6086G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: None (Application) Respondent By: Sh. Rabin Chaudhari, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 23.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: None (Application)For Respondent: Sh. Rabin Chaudhari, CIT DR

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 154Section 69

80,000.00 out of the addition of Rs. 3,00,000.00 on account of low withdrawal for house hold expenditure made by the assessing officer by ignoring the correct facts of the case, which is highly unjustified and illegal, hence part of the addition as maintained deserves to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the addition

KAMLA DEVI,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

KAMLA DEVI,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA,FATEHPUR vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI (AO:ITO-2(4),FATEHPUR, FATEHPUR