Search: house property

5 results for “house property”+ Section 32(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 119 Section 2(15)9 Section 695 Section 143(3)5 Addition to Income5 Section 123 Section 260A3 Exemption3 Unexplained Investment2

RAJESH KUMAR JAISWAL,,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY/ACIT(CENTRAL), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 16/ALLD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad02 May 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: the query raised by the assessing authority vide questionnaire issued under section 142 (1) dated 23.01.2021, in assessment proceedings for the AY 2018-19.

For Appellant: Sh. Nikhil Agarwal & Ms. VidishaFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 115Section 115BSection 142Section 24Section 250Section 68Section 69

house tax. 7 A.Y.2018-19 Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal b. In view of the fact that the assessee had given two of his premises for rent on a day to basis and appointed a manager for each property, he held that the assesseewas in the business of letting out properties and accordingly, he confirmed the decision of the ld. AO to treat

RAJESH KUMAR JAISWAL,,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY/ACIT(CENTRAL), ALLAHABAD

RAJESH KUMAR JAISWAL,,ALLAHABAD vs. DEPUTY/ACIT(CENTRAL), ALLAHABAD

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

SHAKUN DEVI,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD