Search: house property | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

14 results for “house property”+ Section 154clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi762 Mumbai699 Karnataka500 Bangalore214 Jaipur159 Hyderabad115 Chennai109 Ahmedabad97 Kolkata83 Cochin73 Indore62 Chandigarh56 Pune51 Calcutta51 Visakhapatnam49 Telangana39 Amritsar37 Raipur36 Surat31 Guwahati24 Lucknow24 SC16 Allahabad14 Cuttack13 Nagpur10 Rajkot8 Jodhpur6 Panaji6 Patna6 Agra5 Rajasthan5 Kerala4 Orissa3 Varanasi2 Andhra Pradesh1 Jabalpur1 ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1

Key Topics

Section 25033 Section 15424 Section 153A22 Addition to Income14 Section 13212 Section 6912 Section 15311 Section 13911 House Property11 Search & Seizure

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 353/ALLD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

11

Section 143(3)3

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 355/ALLD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 358/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 354/ALLD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 147/ALLD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 149/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 356/ALLD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 145/ALLD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 148/ALLD/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 150/ALLD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

UMA SHANKER AILANI,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITA 357/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao`

For Appellant: Shri. Praveen Godbole, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Namita S. Pandey, CIT DR

Section 132Section 139Section 153Section 153ASection 154Section 250Section 69

section 250 and 154 for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2013-14. 2. Assessee is an individual and derives income from house property

SANJAY MAJUMDAR,ALLAHABAD vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

ITA 68/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad28 Jan 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2012-13 Mr. Sanjay Majumdar, V. The Principal Commissioner Type Ii – 112, Devprayagam Of Income Tax, Sangam Vatika – Jhalwa, Aayakar Bhawan, Allahabad 211012 38, M.G. Marg, Civil Lines, Allahabad 211001 Pan: Adopm 2688P (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Basudev Banerjee, CAFor Respondent: Shri Debashish Chanda, CIT-DR

Section 147Section 154Section 263

154 of the 1961 Act , dated 27.02.2017 as mistake apparent from records had crept in the aforesaid reassessment order, and income of the assessee was computed at Rs. 43,55,960/- by rectifying the mistake apparent from records. 4.1 On perusal of the record by ld. Pr. CIT, it was observed by ld. Pr. CIT that AO had allowed indexed

KAMLA DEVI,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

ITA 572/ALLD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad07 Mar 2023AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri. Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2010-11 V. Joint Commissioner Of Smt. Parvati Devi L/H Late Kamla Devi, Sahson, Allahabad, Income Tax, Central Circle, Allahabad U.P. Pan-Bfrpd6086G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: None (Application) Respondent By: Sh. Rabin Chaudhari, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 23.01.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 07.03.2023 O R D E R

For Appellant: None (Application)For Respondent: Sh. Rabin Chaudhari, CIT DR

Section 132Section 143(3)Section 154Section 69

154 dated 30th September, 2014 and the correct date of order was stated to be 27.08.2014 for the assessment year 2010-11. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- “1. That in any view of the matter the assessment framed u/s 143(3) of the income tax act vide order dated 20.12.2011 by the assessing officer

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA,FATEHPUR vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI (AO:ITO-2(4),FATEHPUR, FATEHPUR

In the result, appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 19/ALLD/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad20 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Shri Rajeev Kumar Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A.K. Singh ,Sr. D.R

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 50C

House, G.T. Road, v. Fatehpur, U.P. Khaga, Fatehpur- 212655, U.P. PAN:AHCPG3595K (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant by: Shri Rajeev Kumar Agrawal, Advocate Respondent by: Shri A.K. Singh ,Sr. D.R. Date of hearing: 20.03.2023 Date of pronouncement: 20 .03.2023 O R D E R PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal, filed by assessee, being ITA No.19/Alld./2023, is directed against