Search: house property

5 results for “house property”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 119 Section 2(15)9 Section 143(3)6 Section 50C5 Addition to Income5 Section 123 Section 260A3 Exemption3 Section 142(1)2

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR

Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

penalty proceedings were separately initiated in respect of this addition also. 7.7 In his order for the assessment year 2015-16, the learned Assessing Officer also drew reference to a U.P. Government order dated 7.12.1999, in which there were reservations of 2% to the employees of the Development Authorities in respect of the allotment of residential and commercial properties

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

M/S GANGA NURSING HOME,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT,, ALLAHABAD

AJAY KUMAR GUPTA,FATEHPUR vs. CIT(A), NFAC, DELHI (AO:ITO-2(4),FATEHPUR, FATEHPUR