RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

M/S JAI MAA SHARDA SERVICE STATION,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

VIJAY STONE PRODUCT,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

SUBHASH STONE PRODUCT (P) LTD.,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, (CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD vs. VIJAY STONE PRODUCT, SONEBHADRA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

VIJAY STONE PRODUCT,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(C.C.), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

M/S JAI MAA SHARDA SERVICE STATION,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

M/S SUBHASH STONE PRODUCT PRIVATE LIMITED,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

VIJAY STONE PRODUCT,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

VIJAY STONE PRODUCT,SONEBHADRA vs. ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD vs. VIJAY STONE PRODUCTS, SONEBHADRA

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, (CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

RAMJI VAISH,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CC), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessees are held to be partly allowed as above, while the Departmental appeals in the matter of Vijay Stone

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

investment is not correct and her observation for maintaining the addition partly without appreciating the correct facts is totally incorrect in the facts and circumstances of the case, hence the same is liable to be deleted. 5. That in any view of the matter the interest charged under different sections of the IT Act is highly unjustified and illegal

ASHISH DWIVEDI,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO RANGE-1(1), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

disallowed the entire claim of expenditure and consequently made the addition of Rs.49,670/-. Therefore, the provisions of section 69 of the Income Tax Act are applicable on 3 the said addition. He has further submitted that the assessee has not declared the income from business activity of M/s Ashu Marketing and it was detected by the Assessing Officer during

DINESH KUMAR SINGH,MIRZAPUR vs. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

investments, unexplained money, unexplained expenditure etc. , deducting of income-tax at source on payments made by tax-payers(Chapter XVII-B), prohibition on making payment otherwise than through prescribed banking modes beyond threshold limits(Section 40A(3) ), dealing at arm length price while dealing with relatives and associated concerns in which the tax-payer is interested (Section 40A(2)), disallowance