GAYA PRASAD BAJAJ,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, ALLAHABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 375/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad04 Aug 2021AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2012-13 Gaya Prasad Bajaj, V. Income Tax Officer, 34-A, Chak Zero Road, Ward-1(2) Allahabad, U.P. Allahabad, U.P. Pan-Aampb9895N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Mr. Abhinav Mehrotra, C.A. Respondent By: Mr. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 05.07.2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 04.08.2021
For Appellant: Mr. Abhinav Mehrotra, C.AFor Respondent: Mr. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)
disallowance made is patently illegal and contrary to the true and correct facts and circumstances of the case and liable to be deleted.
3. Because, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned order passed by the Ld. CIT(A) as also that of the Assessing Officer, is unsustainable and bad in law as the right
