SHREE SUDHAKAR PANDEY,SONBHEDRA vs. ACIT RANGE-III,, MIRZAPUR
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed
ITA 7/ALLD/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad15 Dec 2021AY 2014-15
Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2014-15 Shree Sudhakar Pandey, Civil Line, V Acit, Robertsganj, Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh- . Range-Iii, Mirzapur, U.P. 231216 Pan-Alds03711B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Sh. Ashish Bansal, Adv Respondent By: Mr. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07/12/2021 Date Of Pronouncement: 17/12/2021 O R D E R
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. A.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 44A
section 44AD.
Thus the learned AR has submitted that the claim of depreciation was disallowed by the Assessing Officer on wrong presumption of fact. Similarly the CIT(A) has 2
Shree Sudhakar Pandey dismissed the appeal of the assessee on the basis of the facts contrary to the record.
The learned AR pointed that the assessee has given
