BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

16 results for “disallowance”+ Section 245Hclear

Sorted by relevance

Allahabad16Mumbai8Delhi7Jaipur6Indore3Raipur3Pune2SC1

Key Topics

Charitable Trust16

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 35/ALLD/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

ARPIT HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 14/ALLD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL CIRCLE), ALLAHABAD vs. JEEVAN JYOTI CHARITABLE TRUST, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 41/ALLD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL CIRCLE), ALLAHABAD vs. JEEVAN JYOTI CHARITABLE TRUST, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 39/ALLD/2025[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD vs. JEEVAN JYOTI CHARITABLE TRUST, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 40/ALLD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 36/ALLD/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 37/ALLD/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD vs. NAVJEEVAN PEDIATRICS PRIVATE LIMITED, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 44/ALLD/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

MINTO COLONIZERS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 54/ALLD/2025[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

JEEVAN JYOTI INFRASTRUCTURE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 56/ALLD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

MINTO DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 337/ALLD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 34/ALLD/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 40/ALLD/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

ARPIT HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 13/ALLD/2025[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 38/ALLD/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 39/ALLD/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

245H(A)(iiia) and the time limit for the exclusion clause will not be applicable in this case. The issue has been argued in length wherein it has been shown to the Bench that the exclusion clause is available from 01.06.2007 although section 245(h)(iiia) came in the statue from 01.06.2015. (ii) The argument of the appellant is that