M/S KESARWANI MARKETING (P) LTD,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. C.IT,(OSD), ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

disallowance of expenses stood reduced by ld. CIT(A) to Rs. 3,98,526/- , being additions made by invoking provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194C

M/S KESARWANI MARKETING(P).LTD.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT. CIT(OSD),, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

disallowance of expenses stood reduced by ld. CIT(A) to Rs. 3,98,526/- , being additions made by invoking provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194C

M/S KESARWANI MARKETING (P) LTD,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,(OSD), ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

disallowance of expenses stood reduced by ld. CIT(A) to Rs. 3,98,526/- , being additions made by invoking provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194C

M/S KESARWANI <ARKETING (P) LTD,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT (OSD),, ALLAHABAD

In the result appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

disallowance of expenses stood reduced by ld. CIT(A) to Rs. 3,98,526/- , being additions made by invoking provisions of Section 40(a)(ia) read with Section 194C

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, ALLAHABAD vs. M/S DEORA ELECTRIC WORKS, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both appeals i

194C, which they were not required to do. He had submitted details of all such deductions before the ld. AO. Despite this and without considering the fact that the assessee had in fact disclosed A.Y.2009-10 M/s Deora Electric Works much more receipts under the two heads of contract receipts and sales receipts, as compared to what was alleged

M/S DEORA ELECTRIC WORKS,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both appeals i

194C, which they were not required to do. He had submitted details of all such deductions before the ld. AO. Despite this and without considering the fact that the assessee had in fact disclosed A.Y.2009-10 M/s Deora Electric Works much more receipts under the two heads of contract receipts and sales receipts, as compared to what was alleged