BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “depreciation”+ Section 94(7)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,445Delhi1,087Bangalore487Chennai393Kolkata233Ahmedabad221Jaipur97Hyderabad87Raipur64Indore58Pune53Chandigarh44Visakhapatnam31Surat30Cuttack28Lucknow25Cochin22Karnataka21Jodhpur13SC12Rajkot9Guwahati6Allahabad5Nagpur5Telangana5Amritsar4Patna4Punjab & Haryana2Kerala2Dehradun2Calcutta2Ranchi2Jabalpur1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1Orissa1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 1326Section 153A(1)(b)6Section 153A6Disallowance5Addition to Income5Section 143(1)3Section 36(1)3Section 271(1)(c)3Penalty3

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 393/ALLD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Dr. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)

section 145(3) to this extent and made an addition of Rs.1,00,000/- on this account, thereby giving the assessee relief of Rs.86,94,292/-. 3. The second issue in the Department’s appeal is the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete an addition of Rs.2,66,73,629/- on account of unaccounted purchases, without appreciating that

ACIT,, ALLAHABAD vs. M/S KESARWANI & CO., ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal in ITA No

ITA 429/ALLD/2014[2010-11]Status: Disposed
Undisclosed Income3
Section 143(3)2
Section 145(3)2
ITAT Allahabad
29 Nov 2024
AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Dr. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 145(3)

section 145(3) to this extent and made an addition of Rs.1,00,000/- on this account, thereby giving the assessee relief of Rs.86,94,292/-. 3. The second issue in the Department’s appeal is the decision of the ld. CIT(A) to delete an addition of Rs.2,66,73,629/- on account of unaccounted purchases, without appreciating that

KESARWANI & C0.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT., ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 392/ALLD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)

7. With relation to the disallowance of Rs.10,120/- out of repair and maintenance expenses, the ld. CIT(A) observed that the ld. AO had noticed that vouchers for repair expenses under the head institution had not been maintained and the submissions of the appellant for assessment year 2004-05, wherein it had been submitted that only internal payment vouchers

KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 390/ALLD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2007-08
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)

7. With relation to the disallowance of Rs.10,120/- out of repair and maintenance expenses, the ld. CIT(A) observed that the ld. AO had noticed that vouchers for repair expenses under the head institution had not been maintained and the submissions of the appellant for assessment year 2004-05, wherein it had been submitted that only internal payment vouchers

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 389/ALLD/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad29 Nov 2024AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Sh. Praveen Godbole, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Neel Jain, CIT DR
Section 132Section 143(1)Section 153ASection 153A(1)(b)Section 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)

7. With relation to the disallowance of Rs.10,120/- out of repair and maintenance expenses, the ld. CIT(A) observed that the ld. AO had noticed that vouchers for repair expenses under the head institution had not been maintained and the submissions of the appellant for assessment year 2004-05, wherein it had been submitted that only internal payment vouchers