BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 234Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi739Mumbai611Bangalore404Ahmedabad92Kolkata75Chennai70Jaipur38Hyderabad27Lucknow16Chandigarh16Indore16Ranchi14Pune12Surat9Dehradun9Amritsar8Karnataka6Nagpur5Visakhapatnam4SC4Agra3Cochin3Rajkot2Patna2Allahabad2Telangana2Jodhpur1Panaji1Punjab & Haryana1Raipur1Calcutta1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 139(1)4Section 69A3Section 143(1)3Section 234B2Section 36(1)(va)2Disallowance2Addition to Income2Natural Justice2

POOJA GROVER,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CIR-2,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 140/ALLD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad20 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Subhash Malguria & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 234BSection 251Section 69A

depreciation to the extent of Rs.5,29,827/- on the ground that supporting bills and vouchers to the extent of Rs.21,55,472/- are in the name of Umang Graver and Umang Sarees whereas the name of proprietary concern of appellant is M/s Umang. I.T.A. No.140/Alld/2024 3 7. BECAUSE the NFAC has failed to appreciate the facts that Mr. Umang

VINOD KUMAR TANDON,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CPC),, BEGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 29/ALLD/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad22 Nov 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 234BSection 36(1)(va)Section 43B

234B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6. BECAUSE the order appealed against is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice.” 4. The solitary issue arises in this appeal of the assessee is regarding disallowance made while processing the return of income under section 143(1) on account of employees’ contribution which was paid belatedly but before