TRIVENI GLASS LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(3), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao& Shri Ramit Kochar

E R PER BENCH: These threeappeals bearing ITA numbers 19 to 21/Alld./2020 for assessment years (ay’s): 2012-13& 2013-14 has been filed by assessee before Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, U.P. (hereinafter called “the tribunal”) against separateappellate orders passed by ld. Commissioner of Income-tax(A), Allahabad (hereinafter called “the CIT(A)”) . The appeal

VINOD KUMAR TANDON,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CPC),, BEGALURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfilment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD,,MIRZAPUR vs. JT. C.I.T.,, MIRZAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

E R PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These two appeals, filed by assessee, being ITA No.135/Alld./2015 and 136/Alld/2015 for assessment year(s): 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively , are directed against two separate appellate order(s) dated 16.12.2014 and 17.12.2014in Appeal No(s).110/ACIT/R-III/MZP/13-14and 124/JCIT/R- III/MZP/13-14 passed by learnedCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Allahabad (hereinafter called "theCIT

ZILA SAHKARI BANK LTD.,MIRZAPUR vs. ASSTT. COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, MIRZAPUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA no

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

E R PER SHRI RAMIT KOCHAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: These two appeals, filed by assessee, being ITA No.135/Alld./2015 and 136/Alld/2015 for assessment year(s): 2010-11 and 2011-12 respectively , are directed against two separate appellate order(s) dated 16.12.2014 and 17.12.2014in Appeal No(s).110/ACIT/R-III/MZP/13-14and 124/JCIT/R- III/MZP/13-14 passed by learnedCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Allahabad (hereinafter called "theCIT

ACIT CIRCLE-2, ALLAHABAD vs. M/S SHERWANI SUGAR SYNDICATE LTD., ALLAHABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shrivijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 1997-98 The Assistant Commissioner Of V. M/S Shervani Sugar Syndicate Income-Tax, Circle-2, Ltd., Allahabad, U.P. 28, South Road , Allahabad,U.P. Pan/Gir: 19-653-Cv-3480 New Pan: Not Available (Appellant) (Respondent)

e) to Section 43B which refers to any interest on any term loan from a scheduled bank, wherein the deduction for such interest shall be allowed in the previous year in which such sum is actually paid by the assessee. However , vide first proviso to Section 43B, it is provided that in case any such sum is paid by assessee

KESARWANI & C0.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT., ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

E R PER BENCH: These appeals have been filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), Allahabad vide his separate orders dated 14.03.2014, 19.03.2014 and 23.09.2014. As the issues involved in many of these appeals are similar, all the appeals are being taken up for disposal together for the sake of convenience. Ongoing

KESARWANI & C0,,ALLAHABAD vs. JT CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

E R PER BENCH: These appeals have been filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), Allahabad vide his separate orders dated 14.03.2014, 19.03.2014 and 23.09.2014. As the issues involved in many of these appeals are similar, all the appeals are being taken up for disposal together for the sake of convenience. Ongoing

KESARWANI & CO.,ALLAHABAD vs. JT.CIT,, ALLAHABAD

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

E R PER BENCH: These appeals have been filed by the assessee and the Revenue against the orders of the ld. CIT(A), Allahabad vide his separate orders dated 14.03.2014, 19.03.2014 and 23.09.2014. As the issues involved in many of these appeals are similar, all the appeals are being taken up for disposal together for the sake of convenience. Ongoing