RAMENDRA SINGH,KANNAUJ vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4(2)(3), KANNAUJ
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 53/ALLD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad21 Nov 2025AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Ramendra Singh V. The Income Tax Officer Bahadurpur Ward 4(2)(3) Majhigawan Kannauj Kannauj (U.P) Tan/Pan:Gzqps7971P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shvetank Garg, Advocate Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. O R D E R This Appeal Has Been Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 26.07.2023, Passed By The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Nfac) For Assessment Year 2017-18. 2.0 The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Had Not Filed The Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration. The Income Tax Department Was In Possession Of Information That Huge Amounts Have Been Credited To The Assessee’S Bank Account No.001311002103008 Maintained With Farrukhabad District Central Co-Operative Bank, Saurikh, Kannauj By Way Of Cash & Credit Entries. The Assessing Officer (Ao) Issued Notice Under Section 142(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Called “The Act’), Requiring The Assessee To Furnish The Return Of Income For The Year Under Consideration. However, The Said Notice Was
For Appellant: Shri Shvetank Garg, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 115BSection 142Section 142(1)Section 144Section 69ASection 80T
271F and 272(A)(1)(d) of the Act, separately.
2.2
Aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. First Appellate Authority. However, the appeal before the Ld.
ITA No.53/ALLD/2025 Page 3 of 7
First Appellate Authority came to be dismissed ex-parte qua the assessee.
2.3
Now, the assessee has approached this Tribunal challenging the orders
