Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 260clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)7 Section 139(1)6 Section 143(1)6 Section 153A4 Section 43B4 Addition to Income4 Section 2503 Disallowance3 Section 69A

RAHUL SHARMA,MIRZAPUR vs. ITO, WARD 3(2), MIRZAPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 98/ALLD/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad14 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Udayan Das Gupta & Nikhil Choudharyi.T.A. No.98/Alld/2024 Assessment Year: 2017-18

Section 144Section 250Section 69A

260 days , under email id shivkumar.co@gmail.com 3. On the basis of the above facts the assessee prayed that that there has been no intentional or willful default on his part and he has not obtained any benefit by filing the appeal late and on the other hand he has suffered mental agony and physical stress, for default of his appointed

M/S UDVASIT BEROJGAR SAHAKARI SHRAM SAMVIDA SAMITI LTD.,,SONBHADRA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

RAHUL SHARMA,MIRZAPUR vs. ITO, WARD 3(2), MIRZAPUR

M/S UDVASIT BEROJGAR SAHAKARI SHRAM SAMVIDA SAMITI LTD.,,SONBHADRA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), ALLAHABAD

RAHUL SHARMA,MIRZAPUR vs. ITO, WARD 3(2), MIRZAPUR

M/S UDVASIT BEROJGAR SAHAKARI SHRAM SAMVIDA SAMITI LTD.,,SONBHADRA vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), ALLAHABAD

COMMERCIAL AUTO SALES PVT. LTD.,,ALLAHABAD vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE, BENGALURU

SHRI NEERAJ MAHESHWARI,SONEBHADRA vs. DY. CIT, (CPC), BENGALURU

M/S. SUBHASH STONE INDUSTRIES (P) LTD.,NAINITAL vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, ALLAHABAD