Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 249(4)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 107 Condonation of Delay5 Section 1474 Section 249(3)4 Section 249(4)4 Limitation/Time-bar4 Natural Justice4 Section 1443 Section 249(2)

JIYAUDDIN KHAN,MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO 1(4), MAHARAJGANJ, MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 139/ALLD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad30 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguriaassessment Year: 2015-16 Jiyauddin Khan V. Ito-1(4) Bhitauli Bazar, Maharjganj, Aayakar Bhawan, Maharajganj-273302. Maharajganj, Maharajganj-273301. Pan:Bafpk3621P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 24 09 2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30 09 2025 O R D E R

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, Sr. DR

Section 144Section 144BSection 147Section 249(2)Section 69A

Section 249(2) of the Act. According to the date of service of Order/Notice of Demand, the appeal is delayed by approx. 7 and half months. In column no. 14 of Form No. 35, the appellant has stated that there is delay in filing of appeal. 2.2 The appellant has taken plea that there was dispute in the family, therefore

JIYAUDDIN KHAN,MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO 1(4), MAHARAJGANJ, MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH

JIYAUDDIN KHAN,MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO 1(4), MAHARAJGANJ, MAHARAJGANJ, UTTAR PRADESH

GYAN VIKAS SAMITI,AMBEDKAR NAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER , AMBEDKAR NAGAR

GYAN VIKAS SAMITI ,AMBEDKAR NAGAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, AMBEDKAR NAGAR

JAIN SHIKSHA VIKASH SAMITI ,SULTANPUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

RAKESH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA,ALLAHABAD vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

ALOK RAI,ALLAHBAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NFAC DELHI, ALLAHABAD