Search: condonation of delay

1 result for “condonation of delay”+ Section 202clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 1443 Section 142(1)2 Section 69A2 Section 142(1)(i)2

HUSHN JAHAN,AMETHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AMETHI, AMETHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 68/ALLD/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad21 Nov 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2017-18 Hushn Jahan V. The Income Tax Officer Palpur Raebareli Road Amethi Jagdishpur, Musfirkhana Amethi (U.P) Tan/Pan:Autpj9095P (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: Shri Shubham Singh, C.A. Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri Shubham Singh, C.AFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R

Section 115BSection 133(6)Section 142(1)Section 142(1)(i)Section 144Section 69A

202), calculated the income of the assessee from business at Rs.9,84,000/- and added the same also to the income of the assessee. ITA No.68/ALLD/2025 Page 3 of 9 2.2 The AO completed the assessment under section 144 of the Act, assessing the total income of the assessee at Rs.26,34,000/-. 2.3 The AO also invoked the provisions