DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), , ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

condoned and the present appeal may kindly be heard and decided on merits so that justice be done. 21 5ecause, the order is bad in the eyes of law and against the facts and submissions of the case. 22. The appellant craves leave to add/alter any of the ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. Assessment Year

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION, ALLAHABAD,ALLAHABAD vs. JCIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

condoned and the present appeal may kindly be heard and decided on merits so that justice be done. 21 5ecause, the order is bad in the eyes of law and against the facts and submissions of the case. 22. The appellant craves leave to add/alter any of the ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. Assessment Year

DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, DISTRICT MAGISTRATE OFFICE, MINES DIVISION,ALLAHABAD vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), ALLAHABAD RANGE, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao

condoned and the present appeal may kindly be heard and decided on merits so that justice be done. 21 5ecause, the order is bad in the eyes of law and against the facts and submissions of the case. 22. The appellant craves leave to add/alter any of the ground of appeal before or at the time of hearing. Assessment Year

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13 respectively. 2. There is a delay of 271 days in filing all these appeals. The assessee has filed applications for condonation

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13 respectively. 2. There is a delay of 271 days in filing all these appeals. The assessee has filed applications for condonation

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13 respectively. 2. There is a delay of 271 days in filing all these appeals. The assessee has filed applications for condonation

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13 respectively. 2. There is a delay of 271 days in filing all these appeals. The assessee has filed applications for condonation

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

section 200(3) of the Income Tax Act, for the assessment years 2008-09 to 2012-13 respectively. 2. There is a delay of 271 days in filing all these appeals. The assessee has filed applications for condonation

ALOK RAI,ALLAHBAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER NFAC DELHI, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

200/-/- against the returned income of Rs.12,29,630/-. In the aforesaid assessment order addition of Rs.35,71,428/- was made towards unexplained investment u/s 69 read with section 115BBE of the Act and another addition of Rs.9,09,142/- was made towards income from other sources u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Act. The assessment order was passed

ARIANA CHARITABLE TRUST,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO EXEMPTION, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

200, Lukerganj, Allahabad vs. Exemption, Allahabad PAN:AAFTA5592E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sh. Praveen Gupta, C.A. Revenue by: (Application) Date of hearing: 02.12.2024 Date of pronouncement: 02.12.2024 O R D E R PER SH. SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The present case is a result of an order under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter the ‘Act’) dated