BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(ii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai311Delhi226Pune183Chennai165Ahmedabad159Kolkata134Jaipur129Surat104Bangalore101Rajkot56Hyderabad43Amritsar38Lucknow36Indore34Chandigarh31Nagpur27Cuttack14Agra14Cochin10Jodhpur9Visakhapatnam8Karnataka8Panaji8Raipur7Allahabad7Ranchi6Jabalpur5Dehradun5Calcutta4Patna3Telangana3Punjab & Haryana2SC1Varanasi1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 12A25Section 26318Section 80G(5)8Section 1548Section 80G6Exemption5Section 114Section 253(3)2Section 12A(1)(ac)2

PRAYAG EDUCATION TRUST,ALLAHABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 131/ALLD/2024[80 G (5)]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad05 Dec 2024
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 80G(5)

80G(5) of the Act, passed by ld. CIT(Exemption), Lucknow. For the sake of convenience appeal in ITA No.130/Alld/2024 shall be dealt with first. 1.1 In this case, the appellant filed an application for registration under section 12AB of the Act as a new Trust. However, through order dated 28.06.2024, the ld. CIT(Exemption) rejected the said application

PRAYAG EDUCATION TRUST,ALLAHABAD vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

Appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

Condonation of Delay2
TDS2
Revision u/s 2632
ITA 130/ALLD/2024[12AB(1)(B)(II)]Status: Disposed
ITAT Allahabad
05 Dec 2024
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 80G(5)

80G(5) of the Act, passed by ld. CIT(Exemption), Lucknow. For the sake of convenience appeal in ITA No.130/Alld/2024 shall be dealt with first. 1.1 In this case, the appellant filed an application for registration under section 12AB of the Act as a new Trust. However, through order dated 28.06.2024, the ld. CIT(Exemption) rejected the said application

UNIQUE BOOND FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 75/ALLD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(i)

ii)(B) and under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short). (B) These appeals have been filed by the assessee, beyond time limit prescribed under section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeals pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond

UNIQUE BOOND FOUNDATION,JAIPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, LUCKNOW, LUCKNOW

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 74/ALLD/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad17 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 12ASection 12A(1)(ac)Section 253(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(i)

ii)(B) and under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“the Act” for short). (B) These appeals have been filed by the assessee, beyond time limit prescribed under section 253(3) of IT Act. The assessee has submitted application for condonation of delay in filing of the appeals pleading that the delay was unintentional and beyond

UMRAO SINGH SMARAK SAMITI,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, CPC, BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 38/ALLD/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Allahabad23 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rabin Chaudhari, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154

ii) That in view of the matter CPC, Bangalore was not correct in disallowing benefit of Section 11 to 13 under Section 154 of the Act since it is not apparent mistake from record and needs detail scrutiny which was not done hence the order under Section 154 as passed by CPC Bengaluru is highly unjustified. (iii) That in view

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 99/ALLD/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad26 Jul 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh. Pawan Chakrapani, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, CIT DR
Section 263

Trust Act, 1882 and registered with the concerned authorities as applicable in your case. 2. Copy of registration certificate under Section 12AA, U/s 10 (23C) (vi)/(via) and approval u/s 80G (5)(vi) of the IT Act, 1961. 3. Details of bank A/c and copies bank statements for the period under consideration. Details of FDRs and other investments made with

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 107/ALLD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad26 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh. Pawan Chakrapani, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, CIT DR
Section 263

Trust Act, 1882 and registered with the concerned authorities as applicable in your case. 2. Copy of registration certificate under Section 12AA, U/s 10 (23C) (vi)/(via) and approval u/s 80G (5)(vi) of the IT Act, 1961. 3. Details of bank A/c and copies bank statements for the period under consideration. Details of FDRs and other investments made with