BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 264clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka496Mumbai178Bangalore101Delhi97Chennai54Pune29Ahmedabad28Chandigarh16Calcutta16Jaipur14Kolkata13Lucknow10Hyderabad8Surat7Indore7Varanasi4Amritsar4Telangana4Cochin3Allahabad3Rajasthan2Rajkot2Cuttack2Patna2Punjab & Haryana1Agra1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 119Section 2(15)9Section 143(3)3Section 123Section 260A3Exemption3Addition to Income3

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

charitable purpose did not rule out any surplus arising out of activities of the trust / institution but it simply meant that the surplus could again be re-utilized for the objects of an institution. AYs. 2014-15 to 2016-17 The view taken by the ld. CIT(A) was not only contrary to the observations made / findings given

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 87/ALLD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

charitable purpose did not rule out any surplus arising out of activities of the trust / institution but it simply meant that the surplus could again be re-utilized for the objects of an institution. AYs. 2014-15 to 2016-17 The view taken by the ld. CIT(A) was not only contrary to the observations made / findings given

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

charitable purpose did not rule out any surplus arising out of activities of the trust / institution but it simply meant that the surplus could again be re-utilized for the objects of an institution. AYs. 2014-15 to 2016-17 The view taken by the ld. CIT(A) was not only contrary to the observations made / findings given