ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

section 20(2) of the 1973 Act, mandate that the funds of the authority are to be applied towards meeting the expenses of the authority in the administration of that Act and for no other purpose. iv. The contention of the Revenue that the assessee was a commercial enterprise which had undertaken various civil construction work on behalf of State

ARIANA CHARITABLE TRUST,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO EXEMPTION, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Charitable Trust, Income Tax Officer, 200, Lukerganj, Allahabad vs. Exemption, Allahabad PAN:AAFTA5592E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sh. Praveen Gupta, C.A. Revenue by: (Application) Date of hearing: 02.12.2024 Date of pronouncement: 02.12.2024 O R D E R PER SH. SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The present case is a result of an order under section 250

ACHARYA DHARAMCHANDRADEO MEDICAL & RESEARCH TRUST,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT(CPC), , BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2016-17 Acharya Dharamchandradeo Dcit (Cpc), Medical & Research Trust, V. Bangalore-560500 Maharishi Sadafal Deo Ashram , Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Allahabad-211019,U.P. Pan:Aacta3794K (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: None (Application) Revenue By: Sh. A.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.09.2023 & 13.09.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 14.09.2023 O R D E R

charitable in nature and the activities are being carried out as per rules and bylaws of the trust hence the action of the assessing officer and learned CIT (Appeal) is bad in law. 6. That in any view of the matter the appellant reserves her right to take any fresh ground before hearing of the appeal.” 3. The brief facts

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO- 2(1), ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 16.05.2024 and 14.05.2024, respectively. The grounds of appeal preferred by the assessee are as under:- Grounds of appeal in ITA No.108/Alld/2024 “1.That in any view of the matter assessment order dated 21.12.2018 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act is bad both on the fact

AMRESH KUMAR SINGH,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO 2 (1), ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals are allowed for statistical purposes

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on 16.05.2024 and 14.05.2024, respectively. The grounds of appeal preferred by the assessee are as under:- Grounds of appeal in ITA No.108/Alld/2024 “1.That in any view of the matter assessment order dated 21.12.2018 passed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 of the Act is bad both on the fact

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD-1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1(5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

SANJANA,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously

YOGI SATYAM,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, WARD- 1 (5), ALLAHABAD

The appeals are partly allowed

Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Nikhil Choudhary

charitable activities and Kriyayoga, that the assessee was not a businessman or a commercial person but was a saint/monk, propagating Kriyayoga and doing lots of charitable work for the betterment of humanity and, therefore, there was no reason to make the addition on the ground that receipt was more than payments. It was submitted by the Ld. A.R. that obviously