ARIANA CHARITABLE TRUST,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO EXEMPTION, ALLAHABAD, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Charitable Trust, Income Tax Officer, 200, Lukerganj, Allahabad vs. Exemption, Allahabad PAN:AAFTA5592E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Sh. Praveen Gupta, C.A. Revenue by: (Application) Date of hearing: 02.12.2024 Date of pronouncement: 02.12.2024 O R D E R PER SH. SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: The present case is a result of an order under section

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CPC(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

ELCHICO HOTELS & RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CPC (TDS) , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the Appeal No

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Charitable Trust ITO(TDS) 3. Because the order of Ld. C.I.T. (Appeals), Allahabad was bad in law and on facts. The Appellant prays for adducing further or other grounds of Appeal before or at the time of hearing the appeal. 2. The only issue arises in this appeal is regarding validity of adjustments made by the AO on account

VANDANA BANSAL L/H OF LATE DR. ASHWANI KUMAR BANSAL, ,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Charitable Trust (for assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14) and Navjeevan Pediatrics Pvt. Ltd. (for assessment year 2013-14) against the consequential appellate orders of the learned CIT(A) in respect of relief granted by the learned CIT(A). (C) There was search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act conducted in Jeevan Jyoti Group of cases on 29/05/2012

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD vs. NAVJEEVAN PEDIATRICS PRIVATE LIMITED, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Charitable Trust (for assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14) and Navjeevan Pediatrics Pvt. Ltd. (for assessment year 2013-14) against the consequential appellate orders of the learned CIT(A) in respect of relief granted by the learned CIT(A). (C) There was search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act conducted in Jeevan Jyoti Group of cases on 29/05/2012

ARPIT HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Charitable Trust (for assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14) and Navjeevan Pediatrics Pvt. Ltd. (for assessment year 2013-14) against the consequential appellate orders of the learned CIT(A) in respect of relief granted by the learned CIT(A). (C) There was search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act conducted in Jeevan Jyoti Group of cases on 29/05/2012

ARPIT HOSPITAL PRIVATE LIMITED,ALLAHABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Charitable Trust (for assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14) and Navjeevan Pediatrics Pvt. Ltd. (for assessment year 2013-14) against the consequential appellate orders of the learned CIT(A) in respect of relief granted by the learned CIT(A). (C) There was search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act conducted in Jeevan Jyoti Group of cases on 29/05/2012

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(CENTRAL CIRCLE), ALLAHABAD vs. JEEVAN JYOTI CHARITABLE TRUST, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Charitable Trust (for assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14) and Navjeevan Pediatrics Pvt. Ltd. (for assessment year 2013-14) against the consequential appellate orders of the learned CIT(A) in respect of relief granted by the learned CIT(A). (C) There was search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act conducted in Jeevan Jyoti Group of cases on 29/05/2012

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD vs. JEEVAN JYOTI CHARITABLE TRUST, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals and Cross Objections filed by the assessees are allowed and the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Charitable Trust (for assessment year 2011-12 to 2013-14) and Navjeevan Pediatrics Pvt. Ltd. (for assessment year 2013-14) against the consequential appellate orders of the learned CIT(A) in respect of relief granted by the learned CIT(A). (C) There was search & seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act conducted in Jeevan Jyoti Group of cases on 29/05/2012