BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka448Delhi160Mumbai46Hyderabad46Bangalore33Jaipur28Cochin27Chandigarh19Chennai18Lucknow18Calcutta17Pune11Ahmedabad11Kolkata10Varanasi4Cuttack4Jodhpur3Allahabad3Telangana3Orissa2Rajasthan2Indore2Amritsar1Rajkot1SC1Surat1Visakhapatnam1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 119Section 2(15)9Section 143(3)3Section 123Section 260A3Exemption3Addition to Income3

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

trust or institution from being a valid charity. However, in the case of the assessee, the dominant object of the assessee was not charity but commercial activity carried on with profit motive which was evident from the object clause. He noticed that there was nothing in the object clause regarding application of any income of the assessee for charitable purposes

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 87/ALLD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

trust or institution from being a valid charity. However, in the case of the assessee, the dominant object of the assessee was not charity but commercial activity carried on with profit motive which was evident from the object clause. He noticed that there was nothing in the object clause regarding application of any income of the assessee for charitable purposes

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

trust or institution from being a valid charity. However, in the case of the assessee, the dominant object of the assessee was not charity but commercial activity carried on with profit motive which was evident from the object clause. He noticed that there was nothing in the object clause regarding application of any income of the assessee for charitable purposes