BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Deductionclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai947Delhi613Chennai506Bangalore402Karnataka379Pune209Kolkata204Ahmedabad191Jaipur132Hyderabad119Amritsar52Chandigarh47Indore47Lucknow41Surat40Cochin38Rajkot28Nagpur26Cuttack25Visakhapatnam22Jodhpur22Calcutta17Telangana15Guwahati10Agra10SC9Ranchi9Jabalpur6Raipur6Kerala5Patna5Allahabad5Rajasthan4Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun2T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Panaji1Varanasi1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 1117Section 2(15)9Section 1548Section 12A4Exemption4Addition to Income4Section 143(3)3Section 123Section 260A3

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

trust, but not to examine the application of income. He pointed out that in the case under consideration, the assessee’s only evidence in support of its submission of being a charitable organization, was the order under section 12A which had been initially denied by the ld. CIT(Exemption) but granted later by higher courts. The ld. CIT(A) argued

Section 143(1)3
Deduction2

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 87/ALLD/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

trust, but not to examine the application of income. He pointed out that in the case under consideration, the assessee’s only evidence in support of its submission of being a charitable organization, was the order under section 12A which had been initially denied by the ld. CIT(Exemption) but granted later by higher courts. The ld. CIT(A) argued

ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW

In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed

ITA 88/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary

For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A

trust, but not to examine the application of income. He pointed out that in the case under consideration, the assessee’s only evidence in support of its submission of being a charitable organization, was the order under section 12A which had been initially denied by the ld. CIT(Exemption) but granted later by higher courts. The ld. CIT(A) argued

UMRAO SINGH SMARAK SAMITI,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, CPC, BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee in ITA No

ITA 38/ALLD/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Allahabad23 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Rabin Chaudhari, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 154

deduction u/s.11(1)(a) and taxing the gross receipts of Rs.94,60,424/- in view of non-filing of the audit report (Form-10B) along with the return, as required u/s.12A(1)(b) of Income tax Act read with 1st Proviso to Rule 12(2) of the Income Tax Rules. The appellant is a Public Charitable Trust

BHARTIYA SHIKSHA SAMMITTEE KASHI PRADESH,ALLAHABAD vs. DC/ACIT-2(CPC) , ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 182/ALLD/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad16 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Anadee Nath Misshra & Shri Subhash Malguria

Section 11Section 12ASection 12A(2)Section 143(1)Section 253(3)

Trust being Gross Receiving Rs.69,06,710/- without allowing the deduction incurred for educational purpose as per Audited Income and Expenditure Account and where after deducting the expenditure, the net deficit of Rs.51,216/-. 4. The Addition upheld is contrary to the facts, law and principle of natural justice and without allowing sufficient time and opportunity to have