ALLAHABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,ALLAHABAD vs. ACIT (EXEMPTION), LUCKNOW
In the result all three appeals of the Assessee are partly allowed
ITA 89/ALLD/2020[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Jan 2025AY 2016-17
Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudhary
For Appellant: Sh. Ashish Bansal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 260A
capital nature, could not be treated as an income earned during the year by the appellant. Therefore, the sum of Rs. 12.97 Crores could not be treated to the income of the appellant authority, much less taxed in its hands.
8.3
The learned CIT(A) did not agree with the submissions of the assessee. He pointed out that