MOHD UBAID ANSARI,ALLAHABAD vs. ITO, ALLAHABAD , ALLAHABAD
In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 62/ALLD/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad21 Nov 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Shri. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2015-16 Mohd Ubaid Ansari V. The Income Tax Department 337, Sultanpur Bhawa (Faceless) Noorulla Road Khuldabad Allahabad (U.P) Tan/Pan:Bajpa0699B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By: None Respondent By: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R. O R D E R
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh, D.R
Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144BSection 147Section 149Section 69A
Capital Gain” for the reason that the assessee had not submitted the proof to evidence the indexed cost. In the appellate proceedings, the NFAC dismissed the appeal of the assessee on merits for the reason that the assessee had not submitted the relevant details and source of cash deposits
