BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “TDS”+ Section 274clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai348Delhi335Bangalore163Karnataka84Jaipur73Chennai69Ahmedabad61Kolkata60Pune45Chandigarh34Lucknow24Raipur24Rajkot21Hyderabad21Indore21Dehradun20Surat20Visakhapatnam16Amritsar12Cuttack9Agra8Allahabad7Cochin7Ranchi3Jodhpur3Telangana2Varanasi2Patna2Nagpur2Jabalpur1SC1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)7Penalty7TDS6Section 272A(2)(k)5Section 200(3)5Section 2275Limitation/Time-bar5Condonation of Delay5Section 1442Section 142(1)

LATE SRI ZIA USMANI THROUGH L/H AND WIFE SMT. MEHVISH USMANI,ALLAHABAD vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 143/ALLD/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad12 Apr 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

Section 142(2)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

274 of the Income Tax Act dated 31.12.2010 and submitted that the Assessing Officer has not specified the default/charged for which the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was initiated by him. Thus the Ld. AR has submitted the Page 3 of 12 Late Shri Zia Usmani initiation of the penalty proceedings is not valid as the Assessing Officer

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

2
Addition to Income2
ITA 382/ALLD/2018[2011-12]Status: Disposed
ITAT Allahabad
10 Dec 2020
AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS in terms of Section 204 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the additional evidence sought to be produced by the assessee in support of the fact that the Principal of the school is not responsible officer against whom the penalty proceedings can be initiated or levied. He has also referred to the notice

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 383/ALLD/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS in terms of Section 204 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the additional evidence sought to be produced by the assessee in support of the fact that the Principal of the school is not responsible officer against whom the penalty proceedings can be initiated or levied. He has also referred to the notice

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 380/ALLD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS in terms of Section 204 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the additional evidence sought to be produced by the assessee in support of the fact that the Principal of the school is not responsible officer against whom the penalty proceedings can be initiated or levied. He has also referred to the notice

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 381/ALLD/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS in terms of Section 204 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the additional evidence sought to be produced by the assessee in support of the fact that the Principal of the school is not responsible officer against whom the penalty proceedings can be initiated or levied. He has also referred to the notice

PRINCIPAL MAULANA AZAD INTER COLLEGE,,SIDDHARTH NAGAR vs. JOINT CIT(TDS), ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 379/ALLD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad10 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinav Mehrotra, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. K. Singh,Sr. DR
Section 200(3)Section 227Section 272A(2)(k)

TDS in terms of Section 204 of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the learned AR has submitted that the additional evidence sought to be produced by the assessee in support of the fact that the Principal of the school is not responsible officer against whom the penalty proceedings can be initiated or levied. He has also referred to the notice

INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD-2(2), ALLAHABAD vs. MONAD INFRASOLUTION LIMITED, ALLAHABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purpose and the Cross-objection of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 62/ALLD/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad19 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kocharassessment Year: 2015-16 Income Tax Officer, V. Monad Infrasolution Limited, Ward-2(2), Allahabad C-80 Gtb Nagar Kareli, Allahabad, 211016 U.P. Pan-Aajcm2155J (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 01/Alld/2021 In Assessment Year: 2015-16 Monad Infrasolution Limited, V. Income Tax Officer, C-80 Gtb Nagar Kareli, Ward-2(2), Allahabad Allahabad, 211016 U.P. Pan-Aajcm2155J (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. Rabin Chaudhuri, CIT. D.RFor Respondent: Mr. Ashish Bansal, Adv
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144

274 r.w.s 271(1) (c) is also issued.” 13. It is clear from the assessment order that the AO issued notice under Section 143(2) through e-mail as well as registered post but there was no compliance. The AO then issued notices under Section 142(1) on 26.10.2017 and 04.12.2017 but ITA No. 62/ALLD/2020 and C.O. No. 01/ALLD/2021 (arising