Search: TDS | BharatTax

6 results for “TDS”+ Section 263clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 26321 Section 14812 Section 4012 Section 143(3)7 TDS6 Section 194C5 Addition to Income4 Revision u/s 2633 Section 2502 Section 1

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 107/ALLD/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad26 Jul 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri.Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Sh. Pawan Chakrapani, C.AFor Respondent: Sh. Ramendra Kumar Vishwakarma, CIT DR

Section 263

Section 263 and requires to be cancelled under the facts and circumstances of the Appellant’s case. 3. The Ld. Pr. CIT failed to appreciate that the direction to make fresh assessment amounts to ordering for making fishing and roving enquires without any material in support thereof and consequently the impugned order passed is bad in law is liable

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

M/S. RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE,HYDERABAD vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ALLAHABAD

M/S RITHWIK RK JOINT VENTURE vs. PR. CIT, ALLAHABAD

MAHAVIR PRASAD SATISH CHANDRA,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(3) , ALLAHABAD

SHAKUNTALA KUSHWAHA,ALLAHABAD vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER 2(3), ALLAHABAD

M/S DEORA ELECTRIC WORKS,ALLAHABAD vs. DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, ALLAHABAD

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1, ALLAHABAD vs. M/S DEORA ELECTRIC WORKS, ALLAHABAD